Research summary : Does dental appearance impact on employability in adults?

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41415-020-2025-5

This study wanted to look at the qualitative and quantitative evidence of the current literature regarding the impact of dental appearance on employability. 

Background:

  • Physical appearance in social and professional situations is well known to be of importance.
  • There is unquestionable evidence that ‘facial attractiveness’ can influence unrelated personal characteristics.
  • Judgements are subconsciously made in as little as 100 milliseconds. 
  • Not smiling can also negatively affect someone’s ratings- and women suffer a greater negative impact.
  • In the last 50 years, OH care has improved all around the world, so in turn we’ve seen a rise in the standard and the socially-accepted dental appearance- this includes missing, discoloured or misaligned teeth less and less. 
  • The changing importance of a good dental appearance is also swayed by television makeover shows and social media. 
  • Cosmetic dentistry was the ‘most desired non-surgical cosmetic treatment’ in 2018 (UK).

Reasons why poor dental appearance may negatively affect someone’s employability opportunities:

  • Difficulty talking, smiling or laughing (due to embarrassment)
  • Low confidence
  • Interviewers quickly make less favourable judgements 

Long term employment can indirectly decrease the risk of depression, cardiovascular disease and a myriad of other diseases. It would therefore make sense for the UK ‘return to work’ programmes to include help for access to dental care.

Method:

  • Scoping review 
  • PRISMA flow diagram:
  • Search engines/databases used: Google, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Social Policy and Practice, Embase and Medline via Ovid- 982 studies identified

Results: Looking into various different studies, here were some findings:

  • A one-point increase in the ‘Dental Problem index’ was associated with a 7.7% reduction in being employed (controlled= age, gender, marital status, education, poverty and health status)
  • Malocclusion negatively impacted perception of intelligence, but not of honesty and work efficiency
  • Dental appearance assumptions- related to drug use, needing time off work.
  • Characteristics that are perceived more negatively: intelligence, education,  trustworthiness, laziness, reliability, sociability and friendliness.
  • In Canada- recipients of an employment-assistance programme were offered free basic dental care- employment outcomes were not significantly different 12 months after.
  • ‘Job- seeking self-efficacy’* increased after dental care

*self-confidence and willingness to make applications and attend interviews

Discussion:

  • A wide range of study types were found however few directly addressed the question of interest.
  • All relevant studies reported negative bias on ‘work-related personal characteristics’ 
  • Only 1 of the 3 studies that specifically investigated impact of DENTAL TREATMENT on employment reported any evidence of benefits.
  • Benefits of dental treatment seem to be related more to the increased confidence rather than directly related to being employed.
  • Further evidence such as from an RCT is needed

Conclusion

  • Further research is needed to provide sufficient evidence of the employability benefits that programmes to improve dental appearance can provide
  • However, from another perspective- this programme could be justified already in terms of ‘reducing health and social inequalities and capacity to benefit from publicly funded healthcare’

Nicole Hasoon BDS4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *